NEET PG 2024: The ongoing legal case surrounding the NEET PG 2024 has been postponed once again, with the next hearing now scheduled for December 3rd, 2024.

The case was not taken up for arguments as planned today because the counsel representing the petitioners was unavailable. The petitioners requested a short adjournment, which was granted by the court.

The petitioners have asked the court to prioritize the 2024 case (Ishika Jain vs National Board of Examinations, or NBE) over earlier cases, which focused on issues related to previous years’ NEET PG answer keys.

The 2024 case primarily deals with concerns about the normalization process in the exam, which adjusts scores based on varying levels of exam difficulty across different test sessions.

This issue has been a point of contention for many candidates, and its resolution will be key for the upcoming exam.

The case has now been posted for hearing on December 3rd, where the court is expected to hear arguments related to the normalization process and other issues affecting NEET PG 2024.

This delay means that candidates preparing for the NEET PG 2024 are still waiting for clarity on key issues, such as the exam pattern and any potential changes in scoring.

The upcoming hearing is critical, as it may provide more details on how the exam will be conducted and how the challenges to the normalization process will be addressed.

NEET PG 2024  SC hearing  postponed again

The NEET PG 2024 Supreme Court hearing has been postponed for the fourth time, causing disappointment among students.

Due to transparency, the normalisation process, and the release of the NEET PG answer key and raw marks, the hearing has been rescheduled for November 26.

The NEET PG 2024 hearing has been delayed once more by the Supreme Court of India. The originally set hearing on November 20, 2024, has been rescheduled to November 26, 2024.

The event focusing on NEET PG 2024 transparency, answer key release, and raw marks has been postponed multiple times, infuriating students and raising concerns about the judicial system.

Nonetheless, students are unhappy yet optimistic that the Supreme Court will consider their request and come to a fair decision.

A group of NEET PG 2024 applicants presented a plea to the Apex Court, asking for the SC’s involvement in the transparency of NEET PG and requesting the NBE to provide the exam’s answer key, raw marks, and information on the normalization method used for result calculation.

Nevertheless, despite multiple requests from the candidates, the board has not accepted them, as reported by TOI.

NEET PG 2024 SC Hearing: Sequence of Events

19 NEET PG candidates submitted a petition for transparency in NEET PG 2024 on September 7, 2024, due to concerns over last-minute changes in the exam pattern.

Since the examination was conducted in two sessions, the regularisation process was used to prepare the results.

Nonetheless, the petitioners also brought up issues regarding the transparency of the result processing.
The initial SC hearing for NEET PG 2024 was set for September 20, 2024, but it was rescheduled for October 4, 2024.

The hearing was rescheduled for October 25, 2024, due to the lack of a government representative. The hearing was postponed two more times, to November 12 and November 20, 2024.

Telangana PG Counselling: The Telangana PG counselling process for NEET PG 2024 candidates has been delayed due to legal challenges surrounding a controversial local quota amendment introduced by the state government.

Telangana PG Counselling: High Court Adjourns Local Quota Case to November 25

The Telangana High Court, hearing petitions against Government Order (GO) 148, has adjourned the matter to November 25, temporarily halting the counselling process.

Government Order (GO) 148 redefines the eligibility criteria for “local candidates” under the convenor quota. According to the revised definition, candidates who completed their MBBS in Telangana but were originally classified as non-locals are excluded from the local category for PG medical admissions.

Over 4000 PG Students gets affected 

However, candidates who studied in institutions outside Telangana during the state’s common capital era will be considered local. This rule has sparked significant opposition, with candidates claiming that approximately 4,000 aspirants are adversely affected.

Senior counsel A. Venkatesh, representing some of the petitioners, argued that the amendments violate the law by altering established rules after the admission notification was issued in April 2024.

Counsel B. Mayur Reddy added that the new criteria conflict with the Supreme Court’s precedent in the Pradeep Jain case, which prohibits residence as the sole basis for reservation.

Telangana PG Counselling Temporarily Halted

Advocate General A. Sudarsan Reddy, representing the Telangana government and the Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences (KNRUHS), defended the amendments.

While requesting additional time to present the state’s rationale, he assured the court that the PG counselling process, including merit list publication, would remain on hold until November 25.

Court’s Interim Decision

The High Court directed the authorities to suspend all counselling activities, including the second round of Ayush PG course admissions, until the case is resolved.

This pause has created uncertainty among aspirants, who are now awaiting clarity on the revised rules.

Implications for Telangana PG Counselling

This legal dispute underscores the complexities involved in balancing regional preferences and constitutional mandates in medical admissions. To check updated notices please visit Telangana PG counselling – https://www.knruhs.telangana.gov.in/

Candidates affected by the revised definition are left in limbo, with concerns about fairness and transparency dominating the discourse.

The outcome of this case could set a significant precedent for how local quotas are defined and implemented in the future.

Read this – 4000 Andhra MBBS Students Are Ineligible for Telangana PG Counselling 2024

Telangana PG counselling: In Telangana, over 4,000 MBBS graduates from Andhra Pradesh have been faced with a significant obstacle in pursuing their postgraduate (PG) medical education following recent changes under Government Order (GO) 148, which have impacted their eligibility for Telangana PG counselling.

Due to the revised regulations, these graduates are now barred from applying for PG counselling within Telangana, even though they completed their MBBS in the state.

As a result, widespread concern has been generated among the students, who have begun urging the Telangana government to reconsider this policy and restore their eligibility for Telangana PG counselling.

 Impact on Telangana PG Counselling

Under GO 148, students who completed their education outside Telangana, even if they earned an MBBS degree within the state, have now been reclassified as non-locals for Telangana PG counselling.

Consequently, they are unable to participate in PG counselling in Telangana, which has left many Andhra Pradesh students with limited options for advancing their education. Furthermore, these students, who had spent nearly a decade in Telangana’s education system, have felt unjustly excluded from opportunities within Telangana PG counselling.

Dr. Siva Rama Krishna, a medical graduate affected by this change, expressed frustration, stating, “We have been involved in the Telangana education system from 2014 until 2023, but we are currently shut out from further educational opportunities within the State.”

A Non-Local Status Dilemma in Telangana PG Counselling

One of the primary grievances among these students is their lack of local status in any state, which has effectively excluded them from Telangana PG counselling. Although Andhra Pradesh does not consider them local because they completed their MBBS in Telangana, Telangana’s new regulation now also prevents their participation in Telangana PG counselling.

Thus, despite having studied for years in Telangana, these students find themselves unable to pursue further medical education through Telangana PG counselling or within Andhra Pradesh. This dilemma is seen as particularly troubling since no other Indian state has implemented similar residency rules barring graduates from local PG admissions.

Appeal for a Grace Period in Telangana PG Counselling

In response, the affected students have petitioned the Telangana government to implement a grace period that would restore their eligibility for Telangana PG counselling. It is argued by the students that this abrupt policy shift has disproportionately impacted earlier MBBS batches who could not have anticipated this change.

Broader Implications for Medical Education and Telangana PG Counselling

Furthermore, this policy shift has raised questions about the residency criteria used in Telangana PG counselling and its effect on non-local students.

Since Telangana has historically attracted a diverse student body, including students from Andhra Pradesh, the GO 148 regulation could now potentially discourage future enrolment if students feel uncertain about their ability to access Telangana PG counselling after graduation.

Thus, it is anticipated that Telangana’s educational appeal might be affected by the implementation of GO 148.

Looking Forward: Will Telangana Revise GO 148 for PG Counselling?

It is hoped by students and advocacy groups alike that the Telangana government will address the eligibility issue surrounding Telangana PG counselling. By introducing a grace period or adjusting the local status criteria, Telangana may be able to prevent the disruption in academic plans for its medical graduates.

For the time being, these 4,000 affected students continue to await a response, maintaining their advocacy for a fair solution to the barriers unexpectedly imposed by GO 148 on their eligibility for Telangana PG counselling.

Read this – UP Government Announces Fee Hike for MBBS, BDS, MD/MS, and MDS Programs 2024-25