In a significant development, the Delhi High Court has ordered the Consortium of National Law Universities (NLUs) to exclude a specific question from the CLAT 2025 evaluation process. The verdict follows a legal challenge filed by a candidate who argued that the question in the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) was ambiguous and misleading.
Court's Stand: Student's Argument Holds Merit
A bench led by Justice C Hari Shankar held that the particular question lacked clarity and had more than one plausible interpretation. The judge stated that the presence of multiple "possible" answers violated the standard of objective assessment, which is core to competitive entrance examinations like CLAT.
While the court didn’t interfere with the overall exam structure or remaining evaluation process, it emphasized that the contested question must be excluded from the final scoring to ensure fairness and consistency.
What It Means for CLAT 2025 Aspirants
The decision comes as a relief for thousands of aspirants, especially those who were confused by the controversial question. Candidates can expect the CLAT 2025 result and rank lists to be updated accordingly, with one less question contributing to the final score.
The Consortium of NLUs, which conducts CLAT annually for admission to premier law universities in India, has yet to issue a formal statement in response to the judgment. However, following the court’s ruling, they are expected to revise their answer key and reevaluate scores soon.
Background: Question Dispute Triggered Legal Review
The petitioner, a CLAT 2025 candidate, approached the Delhi High Court claiming that the question carried more than one correct answer, leading to an unfair deduction of marks. After reviewing the content, the court concurred that the structure and phrasing of the question could indeed confuse even well-prepared candidates.
CLAT 2025 Results Likely to Be Updated
With the court’s intervention, the National Testing Agency (NTA) or the Consortium will now have to re-calculate marks by omitting the invalidated question. This could slightly impact the rankings and percentile scores of candidates who were closely tied near the cut-offs for top law schools like NLSIU Bangalore, NALSAR Hyderabad, and NLU Delhi.
Awaiting Consortium's Response
As of now, the Consortium has not issued a public statement. However, in light of the court’s ruling, it is expected to act swiftly and responsibly by releasing an updated answer key and issuing clarification on the next steps in the CLAT 2025 admission process.
Powered by Froala Editor
